Acquisitions rarely share a POS
The moment a group grows by acquiring a concept, it usually inherits that concept’s POS. Guest data then lives in two systems that do not know about each other, and the group-wide view quietly stops being accurate.
Comparison
POS-native marketing is convenient and inexpensive, and for a single-concept operator on one POS it is often enough. Multi-concept groups tend to outgrow it in a specific, predictable way.
If every one of your locations runs the same POS, and the campaigns you want to send are driven by spend and frequency, using the tools already bundled with your POS is the pragmatic choice. It is cheaper, there is nothing new to integrate, and the data is already there.
It is a genuinely reasonable place to start, and we would rather you start there than buy something you do not need yet.
The difference
The moment a group grows by acquiring a concept, it usually inherits that concept’s POS. Guest data then lives in two systems that do not know about each other, and the group-wide view quietly stops being accurate.
The register records what was spent. It does not know the table was booked for an anniversary, that the party asked for a quiet corner, or that this guest left a two-star review last month. Those live in the reservation system and on Google.
A guest with eight visits who leaves a two-star review is a service-recovery situation, not a support ticket. That connection only exists if reviews and visit history sit in the same place.
A guest who visits three of your concepts is one relationship with your group, not three anonymous customers. That resolution has to happen above the POS, because no single POS can see the others.
Due diligence
Including us. If an answer is vague, that is the answer.
Bring an export from the system you already run. We will show you what is in it.
Get early accessCompliments of the house.
Other comparisons